Future Health Frontiers Articles Beauty & Skin Health

Beauty and Skin Health Essay Sample

By:Stella Views:394

First, the underlying logic of beauty behavior is to serve skin health. All beauty methods that come at the expense of long-term skin health are not worth choosing, no matter how amazing the short-term results are.; Second, there is no universal beauty formula. Individual skin type, age, living environment, and past skin history will all affect the suitability of the plan. ; Third, the upper limit of the effect of skin care-grade beauty is far lower than public expectations. Good work and rest, diet, and sun protection habits have a much greater impact on skin condition than skin care products that cost several thousand yuan each.

Last year, I met a 22-year-old girl. In order to pursue the "cool white skin" promoted by bloggers, she applied 30% fruit acid at home twice a week. She also added 3 different whitening essences and wiped her face with exfoliating toner every day. In less than three months, her originally healthy oily skin turned into severely sensitive skin. When the wind blew in spring, it became red and hot, and even ordinary moisturizers stung. It took almost a year to build up the barrier. I have seen hundreds of similar cases in my eight years of skin management career. Most of them equated “beauty” with “skin care,” completely ignoring the physiological tolerance threshold of the skin itself.

In fact, there are always two voices in the industry arguing fiercely about the relationship between beauty and skin health. One group is the "efficacy radicals", most of whom are ingredients parties and medical beauty practitioners. They believe that skin improvement itself requires sufficient stimulation: for example, collagen regeneration in the dermal layer inherently requires controllable micro-damage. Legal and compliant non-exfoliation fractional and Thermage projects have been clinically proven to improve acne pits and static fine lines. As long as the operation is standardized and post-operative repair is in place, it will not cause harm to skin health. ; High-concentration functional ingredients such as retinol and prototype VC can indeed delay photoaging as long as you establish a good tolerance. There is no need to talk about "strong medicine" for discoloration. The other group is the "barrier conservatives", mostly dermatologists, who prefer "less effort is the best beauty." Survey data from the Dermatology Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association in 2023 shows that 72% of urban women have varying degrees of skin barrier damage, and more than 60% of them are related to the excessive use of functional skin care products and blindly following the trend of medical beauty projects. The essence of many so-called "beauty" is to destroy the skin's original defense system, which is not worth the gain.

Both views actually have their own applicable scenarios, and there is no need to be black and white. I used to have a 35-year-old client who was an extreme conservative. He dared not touch any effective products. He only used baby cream every day. His skin was dark yellow and had obvious sun spots. He always felt that using whitening products would ruin his face. Later, we did a skin test on her and confirmed that her barrier was healthy. We gave her a mild plant enzyme exfoliation once a week, and used 10% concentration of prototype VC essence in the morning and evening. In three months, her skin tone became two shades brighter, her sun spots faded by half, and her barrier was completely intact. But on the other hand, I have also seen a 40-year-old male client who underwent Thermage three times and thread sculpture twice a year in order to fight aging. In the end, he developed localized lipoatrophy and his face was so stiff that he could not even smile naturally. It took more than two years for him to slowly recover.

It's funny. I met a client a while ago who applied the collagen powder he drank on his face. He said that "the direct absorption effect is better" this way. In the end, he looked gloomy and kept silent, and it took him half a month to wear off. Many people's expectations for beauty are too outrageous. They always think that there is some magical product or project that can be solved once and for all, and they ignore the most basic things - research by the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) has long confirmed that people who adhere to hard sunscreen + apply sunscreen every day will have 30% less skin aging at the age of 50 than people who don't use sunscreen. If you stay up until two or three o'clock every day, spending tens of thousands of yuan on anti-aging essences is not as effective as sleeping for 7 hours a day.

Nowadays, everyone is arguing the most about "Is Morning C and Night A a universal formula?" The same goes for it. Use it after healthy oily skin and tolerant skin have established a good tolerance. It can indeed improve oiliness, dullness, and fine lines, and the effect is visible to the naked eye.; However, women with dry skin, sensitive skin, and women who are pregnant and breastfeeding have unstable skin conditions. Blindly following the trend will only ruin the face. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. We in the industry often say "one point for efficacy, nine points for protection." If you finish photorejuvenation and then go to the beach to be exposed to the sun, without applying sunscreen or doing any repairs, you will end up with a negative result and blame the project for being useless. In fact, it is not the problem of the project at all.

Before I make a plan for my clients, I always ask them to do a full set of skin tests, and then ask them about their recent schedule, whether they have any allergies, whether they often stay up late, and whether they take any special medicines. I never give a general template to anyone. After all, your face is your own. Compared with pursuing the current "flawless" effect, being able to use it healthily until you grow old is the most important thing, right?

Disclaimer:

1. This article is sourced from the Internet. All content represents the author's personal views only and does not reflect the stance of this website. The author shall be solely responsible for the content.

2. Part of the content on this website is compiled from the Internet. This website shall not be liable for any civil disputes, administrative penalties, or other losses arising from improper reprinting or citation.

3. If there is any infringing content or inappropriate material, please contact us to remove it immediately. Contact us at: