Which is better, Reiki or energy healing?

There is no absolute answer to "which one is better". Many people regard the two as two completely independent types of healing methods. In fact, Reiki itself is one of the most mature and widely accepted branches of the energy healing system. The comparison that everyone often talks about is essentially a comparison of Reiki and energy healing methods from other schools. The core is to look at the degree of compatibility, and there is no unified judgment.

Speaking of which, in the seven years I have been involved in mind-body and soul healing, the cases I have seen have an almost even split between the two methods. There used to be a girl who worked in Internet operations. She had such insomnia that she had to take half a tablet of Valium to fall asleep after staying up late for a long time. At first, she found a crystal energy healing teacher. Her body felt warm after lying down for an hour at a time, but when she woke up, her mind was still confused. She kept her eyes open until midnight when she lay down. She was introduced to a healer who introduced Usui Reiki. The first time I did it, I didn’t feel anything special. I just curled up on the healing bed and fell asleep. When I woke up, it was already dark. She went home that day and lay down on the bed with a pillow. Later, when she met people, she said that Reiki was much better than other energy treatments. But another client of mine who had an old knee injury was completely the opposite. He tried Reiki three times but felt nothing. Instead, every time he tried general energy healing combined with singing bowls, the pain in his knees was reduced by 70 to 80%, and it took three or four days. However, he always felt that Reiki was too "warm" and the effect was not fast enough.

The controversy over these two methods in the circle has never stopped. Teachers who are responsible for the inheritance of orthodox Reiki always feel that Reiki has a clear inheritance context, fixed rules for the use of symbols, and a necessary enlightenment process before it can be practiced. The screening threshold for practitioners is relatively clear, and the probability of ordinary people finding a healer is lower.； However, practitioners who do open energy healing feel that the framework of Reiki is too restrictive. When encountering some cases with particularly serious emotional blockages or traumatic memories, it is better to use energy healing that can flexibly combine tools such as crystals, sound bowls, and flower essences. The plan can be adjusted according to the real-time status of the case, making it more adaptable.

I rarely make any distinctions when doing my own cases. I met a girl who was too anxious to go out to work. I used open energy healing to help her sort out the emotional garbage on the surface for the first two times. After she relaxed and established trust in the healing, I used Reiki to do deep core repair. In less than a month, she was able to return to the company to check in normally.

To be honest, the academic community has not yet reached a unified conclusion on the effectiveness of energy healing. Many somatosensory improvements are also closely related to the therapist's own condition and the trust of the case. If you really want to choose, don't believe those miraculous propaganda. "Cure all diseases" and "once effective" are all deceptive. It is better to find a reliable therapist and try the experience field once. Whether your body feels relaxed and comfortable is the only criterion for judging whether it is "good or not".